They should be. You can always create a marker that acts as a collection of other markers, so there is no need to support a list in the LogEvent.
Ralph > On Apr 7, 2016, at 7:03 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Aren't hierarchical markers good enough for that? > > On 7 April 2016 at 00:02, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > Didn’t we have this discussion several weeks ago? I don’t see a reason to > support it. > > Ralph > >> On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:51 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com >> <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Before I go down some rabbit hole... >> >> Any thoughts on marking log events with more than one marker? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com> | >> ggreg...@apache.org <mailto:ggreg...@apache.org> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
