>For what it is worth, my own advice is that libraries and framework developers should always include the slf4j-nop if they use slf4j-api. If their end-users want logging, they can always use dependency exclusions to enable it.
That sounds like it'd make it harder for the users than necessary. Plus, getting a log message letting me know that I didn't configure logging properly is useful in case I did mess up something. I do like how that article is formatted, though. Adding bibliography info to your technical articles is pretty neat. On 5 May 2016 at 14:54, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe, but I can’t really agree with his conclusion. > > Ralph > > On May 5, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.russet.org.uk/blog/3112 > > G > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
