On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everything in that util package is log4j-private, so there's no worries > about removing things. > Ah, yes, now I see: "Internal utility classes for the Log4j 2 API. Note that the use of any classes in this package is not supported. There are no guarantees for binary or logical compatibility in this package." I wonder if we should *bold* some of that text. Gary > > On 26 May 2016 at 12:13, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The method: >> >> org.apache.logging.log4j.util.Unbox.isBoxedPrimitive(StringBuilder) >> >> is unused and undocumented. Can we drop it? >> >> I guess it's already in the 2.6 RC1, which is too bad. >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
