If you have the choice, I would say leave it out. Leave out as much as possible because you can always add but you can't remove from a public API...
Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/07/01, at 18:20, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I know. I just wonder if there is any other reason than that, since I > wonder whether I should include it in the Scala API. > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >> Removing the method would break binary compatibility... >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 2016/06/30, at 17:46, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Is there any use case for using Logger.getMessageFactory() from an >>> application? >>> >>> Or is it only useful for implementing custom loggers? I.e. could it be in >>> ExtendedLogger instead? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Mikael Ståldal >>> Senior software developer >>> >>> Magine TV >>> [email protected] >>> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com >>> >>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this >>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message >>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not >>> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, >>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply >>> email. > > > > -- > > > Mikael Ståldal > Senior software developer > > Magine TV > [email protected] > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. > If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. >
