Incidentally YAML feels more modern and user friendly, but it seems like a lot
of the current articles focus on the XML format. I think the YAML support is a
big plus. There's a nice comparison of the two formats for log4j2 here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28101903/what-is-a-sample-default-config-file-in-yaml-for-log4j2
Cheers,
Ole
On 07/07/2016 10:22 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Remko and I try to answer questions on stackoverflow as quickly as possible. I
just responded to yours. But to be honest, you probably could have gotten this
from the manual online. All I really did was take the example from the manual
and tailor it a little bit for use in a Maven build.
Ralph
On Jul 7, 2016, at 7:45 PM, Ole Ersoy <ole.er...@gmail.com
<mailto:ole.er...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Hope it's OK that I ask about this here. If not just say USER LIST!
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38254220/start-configuration-snippet-for-log4j2-properties
I think Stackoverflow, given it's QA guidelines and voting features, are a
great way to speed up adoption and get Log4J2 in front of developers (A lot of
great java devs listen in on the Qs). The more information there is WRT to
specific questions the easier it will be to adopt Log4J2.
Cheers,
Ole
