[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397704#comment-15397704
 ] 

Anthony Maire commented on LOG4J2-1430:
---------------------------------------

Hi Remko

I had a look on the performance page, the tests included in this one are far 
more relevant that the JMH throughput test that measure something that will 
never exist in real world. I will definitely try to run this one with the 
various queue implementations when I will have some time (but I'm currently 
pretty busy). However I'm very surprised with the figures for AsyncLogger : how 
can the throughput still double when thread count double but there are already 
as much thread as available core/hyperthreads ? I suspect there is something 
wrong there. Did you made some investigation on that point ?

About the tests with the RAF appender, I made some further test using the 
rolling variant, with maximum 1 file, and all of that writing to /dev/shm to 
avoid real fs/disk jitter, the maximum rate I had was around 900K msg/s, very 
far from the 3 to 7M msg/s I had with a no-op appender with custom queues. 
Since the JMH test only mesure how fast the appender thread can dequeue (cf a 
huge increase with JCTools queue when I changed the offer method to avoid false 
sharing between producer and consumer), doing comparison on it are really 
pointless. The degree of contention in real world will be really lower, even 
when it is not blocking on disk

> Add optional support for Conversant DisruptorBlockingQueue in AsyncAppender
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1430
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1430
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Appenders
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.1
>            Reporter: Matt Sicker
>            Assignee: Matt Sicker
>             Fix For: 2.7
>
>         Attachments: AsyncAppenderPerf01.txt, AsyncLogBenchmarks.log, 
> conversantvsjctoolsnumthreads.jpg, jctools-vs-conversant-service-time.png, 
> log4j2-1430-jctools-tmp-patch.txt, log4jHaswell2cpu2core.jpg, 
> log4jHaswell2cpu4core.jpg, log4jrafile.log, log4jthread2cpu2core.log, 
> log4jthread2cpu4core.log
>
>
> [Conversant Disruptor|https://github.com/conversant/disruptor] works as an 
> implementation of BlockingQueue that is much faster than ArrayBlockingQueue. 
> I did some benchmarks earlier and found it to be a bit faster:
> h3. AsyncAppender/ArrayBlockingQueue
> {code}
> Benchmark                                                       Mode  Samples 
>        Score       Error  Units
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput10Params    thrpt       20 
>  1101267.173 ± 17583.204  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput11Params    thrpt       20 
>  1128269.255 ± 12188.910  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput1Param      thrpt       20 
>  1525470.805 ± 56515.933  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput2Params     thrpt       20 
>  1789434.196 ± 42733.475  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput3Params     thrpt       20 
>  1803276.278 ± 34938.176  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput4Params     thrpt       20 
>  1468550.776 ± 26402.286  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput5Params     thrpt       20 
>  1322304.349 ± 22417.997  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput6Params     thrpt       20 
>  1179756.489 ± 16502.276  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput7Params     thrpt       20 
>  1324660.677 ± 18893.944  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput8Params     thrpt       20 
>  1309365.962 ± 19602.489  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput9Params     thrpt       20 
>  1422144.180 ± 20815.042  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughputSimple      thrpt       20 
>  1247862.372 ± 18300.764  ops/s
> {code}
> h3. AsyncAppender/DisruptorBlockingQueue
> {code}
> Benchmark                                                       Mode  Samples 
>        Score        Error  Units
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput10Params    thrpt       20 
>  3704735.586 ±  59766.253  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput11Params    thrpt       20 
>  3622175.410 ±  31975.353  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput1Param      thrpt       20 
>  6862480.428 ± 121473.276  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput2Params     thrpt       20 
>  6193288.988 ±  93545.144  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput3Params     thrpt       20 
>  5715621.712 ± 131878.581  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput4Params     thrpt       20 
>  5745187.005 ± 213854.016  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput5Params     thrpt       20 
>  5307137.396 ±  88135.709  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput6Params     thrpt       20 
>  4953015.419 ±  72100.403  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput7Params     thrpt       20 
>  4833836.418 ±  52919.314  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput8Params     thrpt       20 
>  4353791.507 ±  79047.812  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughput9Params     thrpt       20 
>  4136761.624 ±  67804.253  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2Benchmark.throughputSimple      thrpt       20 
>  6719456.722 ± 187433.301  ops/s
> {code}
> h3. AsyncLogger
> {code}
> Benchmark                                                Mode  Samples        
>  Score        Error  Units
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput10Params    thrpt       20   
> 5075883.371 ± 180465.316  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput11Params    thrpt       20   
> 4867362.030 ± 193909.465  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput1Param      thrpt       20  
> 10294733.024 ± 226536.965  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput2Params     thrpt       20   
> 9021650.667 ± 351102.255  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput3Params     thrpt       20   
> 8079337.905 ± 115824.975  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput4Params     thrpt       20   
> 7347356.788 ±  66598.738  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput5Params     thrpt       20   
> 6930636.174 ± 150072.908  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput6Params     thrpt       20   
> 6309567.300 ± 293709.787  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput7Params     thrpt       20   
> 6051997.196 ± 268405.087  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput8Params     thrpt       20   
> 5273376.623 ±  99168.461  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughput9Params     thrpt       20   
> 5091137.594 ± 150617.444  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncLoggersBenchmark.throughputSimple      thrpt       20  
> 11136623.731 ± 400350.272  ops/s
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to