[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15431300#comment-15431300
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1349:
-------------------------------------
Hmmm. "now that LogEvents use ContextData...". The most important operation
with the ThreadContextMap is getting a key. As you say, none of your charts
compare against the prior implementation, which is what I am most interested in
as I would like to know what the trade-off is for implementing this.
> Garbage-free ThreadContext map
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1349
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1349
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Remko Popma
> Assignee: Remko Popma
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: DataStructOpsPerfMediumDataSet.png,
> DataStructOpsPerfSmallDataSet.png, InjectWithConfigProperties.png,
> InjectWithoutConfigProperties.png, ThreadContextPut.png
>
>
> The current ThreadContext map and stack implementations allocate temporary
> objects. This ticket is to investigate and track the work for alternative
> implementations that are garbage-free.
> Both DefaultThreadContextMap and DefaultThreadContextStack are copy-on-write
> data structures: each modification replaces the ThreadLocal object with a
> modified copy. The advantage of this approach is that there is no need to
> make a copy for each LogEvent.
> Also, DefaultThreadContextMap uses a JDK map, the JDK collections tend to
> allocate a lot of temporary objects.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
