[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15433438#comment-15433438
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1349:
-------------------------------------
I think it depends on the implementations. Performance-sensitive users tend to
be either very opinionated on which approach is best, or they like to perform
benchmarks on their actual hardware and applications to see which
implementation works best for them.
> Garbage-free ThreadContext map
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1349
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1349
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Remko Popma
> Assignee: Remko Popma
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: DataStructOpsPerfMediumDataSet.png,
> DataStructOpsPerfSmallDataSet.png, InjectWithConfigProperties.png,
> InjectWithoutConfigProperties.png, ThreadContextPut.png,
> v2_DataStructOpsPerfMediumDataSet.png, v2_DataStructOpsPerfSmallDataSet.png,
> v2_InjectWithConfigProperties.png, v2_InjectWithoutConfigProperties.png,
> v2_ThreadContextGet.png, v2_ThreadContextPut.png
>
>
> The current ThreadContext map and stack implementations allocate temporary
> objects. This ticket is to investigate and track the work for alternative
> implementations that are garbage-free.
> Both DefaultThreadContextMap and DefaultThreadContextStack are copy-on-write
> data structures: each modification replaces the ThreadLocal object with a
> modified copy. The advantage of this approach is that there is no need to
> make a copy for each LogEvent.
> Also, DefaultThreadContextMap uses a JDK map, the JDK collections tend to
> allocate a lot of temporary objects.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
