Do we really need this kind of clutter in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.util?
I'm doubtful... Gary On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we deprecate and leave the old one in place after adding the new > constant? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2016/09/04, at 15:02, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It seems really weird to me to see code like: > > os = NullOutputStream.NULL_OUTPUT_STREAM; > > instead of: > > os = NullOutputStream.INSTANCE; > > or: > > os = NullOutputStream.getInstance(); > > Any objection to this change? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
