With the proposed Mars colonisation, yeah, we could use TimeLocation as
well.

On 3 October 2016 at 16:35, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right now, in the Configurator.shutdown 0 means do not wait at all.
>
> We could have:
>
> > 0 wait
> = 0 don't wait
> -1 wait forever which could map to Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.DAYS. What
> where they thinking stopping at DAYS instead of YEARS? Clearly we are
> missing a TimeLocation.EARTH as well ;-)
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com
> > wrote:
>
>> There is some confusion about what the default value for timeout should
>> be, and what 0 should mean, and whether we should use 0 or -1 to mean "wait
>> forever".
>>
>> The Java API docs are not very clear about this here:
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurren
>> t/Future.html#get-long-java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit-
>>
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurren
>> t/ExecutorService.html#awaitTermination-long-java.
>> util.concurrent.TimeUnit-
>>
>> but clear that zero mean wait forever here:
>> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/Thread.html#join-long-
>>
>> We are unclear in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.util.ExecutorServices where
>> the docs says < 0 to wait forever, but the implementation actually do it
>> for <= 0.
>>
>> We are also unclear in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.LifeCycle2 what 0
>> and < 0 actually mean.
>>
>> We need to clear this up, it is needed for https://issues.apache.org/
>> jira/browse/LOG4J2-1623
>>
>> I suggest that we in ExecutorServices update the docs to match the
>> implemenation, and in LifeCycle2 specify that 0 mean the default timeout
>> for the component (this is what is currently implemented) and -1 for wait
>> forever.
>>
>> --
>> [image: MagineTV]
>>
>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>> Senior software developer
>>
>> *Magine TV*
>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>>
>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>> not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>> email.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to