[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15604280#comment-15604280
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1650:
-------------------------------------
I am still not convinced that a small core jar size is something we should try
to optimize for. Which is why I want to understand the use case...
> log4j2-core diet
> ----------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1650
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Hello,
> log4j2 is ~1.3M. It is a lot to get started with logging and several parts
> are not mandatory to start and rarely needed all together like jackson, db,
> yaml (this one is not that big) etc...Also saw Generate class which is quite
> big but not sure it is needed at runtime and the annotation processor logic
> is never needed at runtime.
> Anyway, by comparison logback and log4j1 are ~500k so hopefully we could only
> pay the same price to get started with log4j2.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
