[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15605332#comment-15605332
]
Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1650 at 10/25/16 1:38 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm, I don't estimate the chances of a new Log4j release that includes
LOG4J2-1627 within 2 months to be very high. (Speaking for myself; the
community may think differently.) IMHO your best chances are with customizing
the shaded jar. The dat file should be included as is.
If changing the dat file format would be beneficial somehow then please raise a
separate Jira ticket for that.
was (Author: [email protected]):
Hmm, I don't estimate the chances of a new Log4j release that includes
LOG4J2-1627 within 2 months to be very high. IMHO your best chances are with
customizing the shaded jar. The dat file should be included as is.
If changing the dat file format would be beneficial somehow then please raise a
separate Jira ticket for that.
> log4j2-core diet
> ----------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1650
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1650
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>
> Hello,
> log4j2 is ~1.3M. It is a lot to get started with logging and several parts
> are not mandatory to start and rarely needed all together like jackson, db,
> yaml (this one is not that big) etc...Also saw Generate class which is quite
> big but not sure it is needed at runtime and the annotation processor logic
> is never needed at runtime.
> Anyway, by comparison logback and log4j1 are ~500k so hopefully we could only
> pay the same price to get started with log4j2.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
