[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15719169#comment-15719169
 ] 

Remko Popma edited comment on LOG4J2-1627 at 12/4/16 6:59 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Concrete candidates for being moved to a separate project:
|| (-) Move|| (?) TBD|| (/) Keep||
|log4j-api-scala_2.10|log4j-bom|log4j-1.2-api|
|log4j-api-scala_2.11|log4j-distribution|log4j-api|
|log4j-flume-ng| |log4j-core|
|log4j-iostreams| | log4j-jcl|
|log4j-jmx-gui| | log4j-jul|
|log4j-liquibase| |log4j-perf|
|log4j-nosql| |log4j-slf4j-impl|
|log4j-samples| |log4j-to-slf4j|
|log4j-taglib| |log4j-web|
| | |log4j-osgi|

(Updated to keep osgi in the main Maven build project.)


was (Author: rem...@yahoo.com):
Concrete candidates for being moved to a separate project:
|| (-) Move|| (?) TBD|| (/) Keep||
|log4j-api-scala_2.10|log4j-bom|log4j-1.2-api|
|log4j-api-scala_2.11|log4j-distribution|log4j-api|
|log4j-flume-ng|log4j-osgi|log4j-core|
|log4j-iostreams| | log4j-jcl|
|log4j-jmx-gui| | log4j-jul|
|log4j-liquibase| |log4j-perf|
|log4j-nosql| |log4j-slf4j-impl|
|log4j-samples| |log4j-to-slf4j|
|log4j-taglib| |log4j-web|


> Move components from the Log4j 2 build into a separate build.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1627
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1627
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>            Reporter: Ralph Goers
>
> The Log4j build has grown to the point that performing releases is very time 
> consuming. One way to help with this is to move some components, especially 
> those that are not typically modified frequently, to another project.  Almost 
> everything besides the API, Core, web and the various bridges could be moved.
> In addition, some core components could be considered for moving to another 
> module such as the mom and db appenders. Perhaps even the JMX support could 
> be moved.
> We should also take into consideration making things line up with the Java 
> profile system in Java 8 and the Java 9 module system.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to