[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15720353#comment-15720353
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1723:
--------------------------------------

Thank you Ludovic!

All tests pass for me with {{mvn clean install}}:

{noformat}
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Log4j 2 ..................................... SUCCESS [  1.160 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j API ................................... SUCCESS [ 17.925 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Core .................................. SUCCESS [16:56 min]
[INFO] Apache Log4j 1.x Compatibility API ................. SUCCESS [ 14.365 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j SLF4J Binding ......................... SUCCESS [  8.240 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j to SLF4J Adapter ...................... SUCCESS [  3.892 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Commons Logging Bridge ................ SUCCESS [  3.537 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Flume Bridge .......................... SUCCESS [ 22.287 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Web ................................... SUCCESS [  7.206 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Tag Library ........................... SUCCESS [ 15.286 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j JMX GUI ............................... SUCCESS [  2.224 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples ............................... SUCCESS [  0.180 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: Flume - Common ............... SUCCESS [  2.539 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: Flume - Remote ............... SUCCESS [  3.142 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: Flume - Embedded ............. SUCCESS [  4.704 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: Configuration ................ SUCCESS [  3.682 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: LoggerProperties ............. SUCCESS [  3.643 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Scala 2.11 wrapper for Log4j API ...... SUCCESS [ 24.312 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Samples: Scala API .................... SUCCESS [  3.983 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j OSGi .................................. SUCCESS [  3.520 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j BOM ................................... SUCCESS [  0.582 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j NoSQL ................................. SUCCESS [  6.086 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4J Performance Tests ..................... SUCCESS [ 17.576 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Streaming Interface ................... SUCCESS [ 12.757 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j JUL Adapter ........................... SUCCESS [ 10.721 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Liquibase Binding ..................... SUCCESS [  3.230 s]
[INFO] Apache Log4j Scala 2.10 wrapper for Log4j API ...... SUCCESS [ 26.637 s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 20:42 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2016-12-04T10:15:57-08:00
[INFO] Final Memory: 50M/513M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{noformat}

> Unwanted transitive dependency on geronimo-jms_1.1_spec
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1723
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1723
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.7
>            Reporter: Ludovic HOCHET
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: patch-log4j2-1723.diff
>
>
> The change from maven-bundle-plugin:2.5.3 to 3.2.0, as part of the study of 
> LOG4J2-1637, caused the dependency on package javax.jms to become non 
> optional which made the OSGi tests to fails. Post LOG4J2-1637, LOG4J2-1664 
> was created to improve the OSGi tests and this problem was "offloaded" to it. 
> Since this problem does not originate in the OSGi tests, I'm creating a new 
> issue for it.
> Since this appeared with a change of maven-bundle-plugin, I had a look into 
> how it processed optional dependencies since it was apparently not handling 
> the optional declaration of jboss-jms-api_1.1_spec. As it happened it did add 
> the javax.jms package from that dependency to the list of optional packages, 
> but at the same time it was adding the same package to the list of required 
> packages. Further checks showed that it was picking up the required package 
> from geronimo-jms_1.1_spec which is a transitive dependency of 
> activemq-broker (shown with dependency:tree). Since the JMS specifications 
> are already included with jboss-jms-api_1.1_spec, the  geronimo-jms_1.1_spec 
> should be excluded.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to