[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15722889#comment-15722889
]
Matt Sicker commented on LOG4J2-1699:
-------------------------------------
Improvement would work. We keep a manual changelog that is more of a master
list rather than relying on the generated JIRA changelog for each release, so
really, the type doesn't matter all that much in the end.
> Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Question
> Components: Appenders
> Environment: Linux
> Reporter: Demetrios Dimatos
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: features
> Fix For: 2.8
>
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure the
> permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on UMASK
> because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with a
> 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because the
> logs may contain sensitive information.
> We will make the modification and set this in the properties file. Now we are
> looking to see what the community position would be on accepting such a
> patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution indefinitely.
> I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching requirements
> recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
