Ok, I think it would've been annoying to match the version numbers. However, each version of Log4j Boot will need to be released with updated versions of Log4j anyways.
On 9 January 2017 at 21:45, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > Please don’t try to match the Log4j version numbers. That would mean we > would have to release them along with each Log4j release, which probably > won’t be necessary. > > I would make the first release -beta, unless you think the first 1.0 > release will be where it needs to be. > > Ralph > > On Jan 9, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So I'm going to go with this name as it's pretty self-explanatory what > it's for. > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j-boot.git > > Quick question: should these version numbers match the log4j versions? Or > can this follow its own versioning scheme starting with 1.0? > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
