BTW, shouldn't we have a putAllValues(final Map<String, V> map) in ObjectThreadContextMap?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote: > I think we named it ThreadContextMap3 since there was already an > ThreadContextMap2 (which is part of 2.7, and we are stuck with it). > > I am fine with renaming it to CleanableThreadContextMap (doing it not). > But I think it should still extend ThreadContextMap2 since it is not really > independent of it. > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Also fine with renaming. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 17, 2017, at 9:07, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think it was originally standalone and changed to the current extending >> interface after feedback on the mailing list. >> >> I'm fine with standalone interfaces and having the implementation >> implement multiple interfaces. >> >> Remko >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 17, 2017, at 6:25, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I agree on not extending interfaces. Some of the other context map >> interfaces are standalone, and I don't see why TCM2 had to extend anything. >> >> On 16 January 2017 at 15:16, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> >>> I presume it was named ThreadContextMap3 so there could be a >>> ThreadContextMap4 since 3 extends 2 and 2 extends the first one. Frankly, >>> I dislike this practice very, very much. Instead, each interface should be >>> named as you suggest and NOT extend the prior interface. Instead, the >>> implementation should declare that it implements each of these. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Can we come up with a better name before we release this and get stuck >>> with such a terrible interface name? All it adds is a removeAll(Iterable) >>> method, so perhaps something like CleanableThreadContextMap or >>> RemovableThreadContextMap. >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> >> > > > -- > [image: MagineTV] > > *Mikael Ståldal* > Senior software developer > > *Magine TV* > mikael.stal...@magine.com > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply > email. > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.