I created LOG4J2-1836 to address this.

Ralph

> On Mar 3, 2017, at 12:01 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> 
> Likewise, I suspect that ProviderUtil should only list 2.6.0 as a compatible 
> version since the implementation must be at that level or higher.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Mar 3, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The Log4jAPIVersion in log4j-provider.properties in log4j-core says it 
>> supports the 2.1.0 API.  Is that actually correct? I suspect that if you try 
>> to use the log4j 2.1 API jar with the log4j 2.8.1 core jar there will be 
>> problems.  Doesn’t Log4j core require a Log4j API jar that is at least at 
>> the 2.6 version?
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to