[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1841?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15903193#comment-15903193
 ] 

Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-1841:
-------------------------------------

Sounds like we should roll back LOG4J2-248. Matt, what do you think?

> Problems with consequences after LOG4J2-248
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1841
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1841
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Boot
>    Affects Versions: 2.8
>         Environment: Linux, Tomcat, WebApps
>            Reporter: Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki
>
> Situation till Log4j v. 2.5 (including it):
> 1. One instance of embedded Jetty (programatically started) WITHOUT 
> definition of the log4j.configurationFile variable.
> 2. WAR deployed on within this concrete instance of the embedded Jetty.
> 3. WAR internally contains own log4j2.xml file. So every Log4j instance, 
> which is global for the WebApp, but local for the Jetty, will search and use 
> configuration in own class path.
> Works in the way that every Web-App got own Log4j configuration and will 
> operate according to own definitions (appenders, layouts, loggers).
> In the Log4j v. 2.6 and later in the same setup we are observing the 
> following:
> Log4j in the applications are reporting problem that config file (log4j2.xml) 
> is not visible. Thus we got message, that Log4j will switch to backup mode 
> which will write only ERRORs in the console.
> We debuged that issue and found that change made in:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-248
> seems to be the main reason.
> We cannot asses if this change was made only with respect to some PMD warning 
> or it has as well some design considerations in background.
> The consequence is that Web Server instance shall define 
> log4j.configurationFile variable, but also it means ALL WebApps will use one 
> single configuration, what makes definitely problem, as all WebApps providers 
> must agree on ONE configuration including appenders configuration, message 
> Layout and so on.
> Consider this report and provide solution (or workaround) or maybe just 
> reasonable comment for the given system setup, please :-).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to