That sounds good; anyone care to create a cvs-snapshot of that code.

Thanks,

Hein


man, 09,.05.2005 kl. 17.32 -0500, skrev Jacob Kjome:
> No need to report a bug, since it isn't one.  Try doing...
> 
>     <logger name="org.apache.log4j">
>         <level value="OFF"/>
>     </logger>
> 
> This should work if one builds from the latest Log4j source.
> 
> 
> Jake
> 
> Quoting Mark Womack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > So noted.  Would anyone be interested in logging a bug?
> >
> > Also, we are in the process of determining the release schedule for v1.3
> > going forward.  Nothing is solid yet, but we are looking at a release of
> > v1.3 before the end of the year, with a beta release around late summer.
> >
> > -Mark
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Juan Jose Garcia Lau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:57 PM
> > > To: Log4J Users List
> > > Subject: RE: log4j 1.3 update needed...
> > >
> > > Best regards developers:
> > >
> > > I agree with Hein, in the next release, please make an option to turn
> > > off the log4j internal output log.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Juan
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hein Meling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Domingo, 08 de Mayo de 2005 03:12 p.m.
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: log4j 1.3 update needed...
> > >
> > > Dear log4j developers.
> > >
> > > I would really like to encourage you to release a new 1.3 alpha7 or
> > > beta1 something ASAP, as alpha6 has been out there for too long without
> > > any updates; and I don't want to spend my time trying to compile a cvs
> > > version, since it does not appear to be straight forward with maven or
> > > some other simple means (that is, I don't want to hunt the net for jar
> > > files...)
> > >
> > > In particular, I find alpha6 quite useless with all its log4j internal
> > > log output polluting the output, similar to this:
> > >
> > > log4j:INFO Creating new logger [jgroup.util.log.Eventlogger] in
> > > repository [default].
> > >
> > > Maybe its possible to turn them off; (have only seen messages on the
> > > list stating otherwise)...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Hein
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to