I was wondering why Google doesn't know about it. I see it's not something that's really missing, but rather an awkward request.
I already spent too much time on this :-) but if I ever implement it, I'll submit. Cheers! > On 05 Jan 2015, at 23:06, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > It isn’t a “trap”. It is simply that you are the first person to ask for the > feature - at least in the last 4 years that I have been following this list. > We generally only implement things either we want to use ourselves or that we > find interesting or compelling. If you, or someone else, provides an > implementation for this we would surely consider including it. > > Ralph > >> On Jan 5, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Goran Karlic <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thank you for the specific and quick answer. >> >> Am I right to suspect that log4j to JUL does not exist is a "trap" meant to >> force people to bother with log4j when they would be perfectly happy with >> JUL? :-) >> >> Sounds a bit Microsoftish. :-D >> >>> On 05 Jan 2015, at 21:38, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, log4j currently does not support this, so you would have to implement >>> this yourself. I recommend that you consider doing this the other way >>> around and route the JUL logging to log4j2. This would give you the >>> performance benefits of async loggers, flexible layouts like PatternLayout, >>> and other conveniences like Lookups, without having to write a single line >>> of java code. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On 2015/01/05, at 21:59, Goran Karlic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just want to redirect log4j to JUL - not the other way around. >>>> >>>> Obviously Google can answer JUL to log4j, but not log4j to JUL - this is >>>> why I am asking the question here. >>>> >>>> How come there is no way to do this simple thing? >>>> >>>> I have some 3rd party module that uses log4j and I just want to make it >>>> output the logs via JUL. >>>> >>>> Do I have to implement it myself? >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 05 Jan 2015, at 20:20, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> The log4j-jul module lets one redirect JUL logging to log4j (so you can >>>>> use async loggers and other log4j2 features). >>>>> >>>>> There is currently no way to redirect application logging that uses the >>>>> log4j api to a JUL implementation. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Remko >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On 2015/01/05, at 15:13, Goran Karlic <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> How can I configure log4j to redirect output to java.util.logging? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
