On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Enric Jaen <[email protected]> wrote:
> or get the json configuration from a NoSQL database > That's a different beast as there is no JDBC for NoSQL... Gary > > Enric > > > En jueves, 29 de marzo de 2018 18:40:23 GMT+1, Ralph Goers < > [email protected]> escribió: > > > I could think of all kinds of weird ways to do this. I could imagine an > Appender table, a Logger table, a Properties table, etc. But at some point > this stuff becomes somewhat free form so the schema would have to account > for that. > > Ralph > > > On Mar 29, 2018, at 10:33 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Interesting. The simplest would be a new JDBC configuration class in > Log4j that gets a complete XML document string from DB table's column... > > > > Gary > > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 11:28 Enric Jaen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes, log4j internally would generate the new xml configuration > > > > > > En jueves, 29 de marzo de 2018 17:05:26 GMT+1, Ralph Goers < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > > > > Will a database configuration could certainly be supported somehow, any > changes to it would most likely still end up in a full reconfiguration as > that is how Log4j generally handles changes to the configuration it detects. > > > > Ralph > > > > > On Mar 29, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Enric Jaen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > I know is possible to change the configuration file dynamically, but I > wonder if could be possible to configure appenders from a database, without > needing to reload the full configuration file. A useful case would be to > change the log level of the appender. > > > RegardsEnric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > > >
