I'm very happy to see the ramifications of trying to backport
java.util.logging in this critique. It's much more convincing than just
stating that JSR47 requires jdk1.4
-Craig
Ceki Gülcü
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Craig Reichenbach/CAM/Lotus)
07/31/2001 Subject: JSR47 vs. log4j (take two)
08:18 PM
Please respond
to "LOG4J
Users Mailing
List"
For the latest developments on the JSR47 front you might want to read:
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique2.html
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]