It all depends on how you name your loggers. The common way to name your loggers is, of course,
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(MyClass.class.getName());
this would end up being called something like:
org.myorganization.mypackage.mysubpackage.MyClass
to have every class in "mysubpackage" have logging enabled for the level "debug" I'd do:
<appender name="A2" class="org.apache.log4j.FileAppender">
<param name="File" value="c:\main.log" />
<param name="Append" value="false" />
<layout class="org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout">
<param name="ConversionPattern" value="%-4r [%t] %-5p %c %x - %m%n"/>
</layout>
</appender>
<logger name="org.myorganization.mypackage.mysubpackage" additivity="false">
<appender-ref ref="MyFileAppender"/>
<level value="debug"/>
</logger>
Notice the additivity="false". If I didn't have that, I'd also be logging what the <root> logger or any other logger this logger might be inheriting from had defined to log.
Is that what you were looking for?
Jake
At 11:32 AM 11/5/2002 -0800, you wrote:
Can a class or group of classes be assigned to appenders independently from other classes?
I'd like to implement a message driven bean in Jboss and I'd like the output of that bean to go to a log file other then the standard application server log.
Thanks,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
