Hey! I read in the faq that calling Logger.getLogger() will kill app performance. I am currently writing a wrapper for a beast called the SAP/webMethod business connector which is an app-server providing a 'unique' flow language to programm services. It would be to quite an effort to ask the developers of those services to keep references to their logger and pass it for each log statement, so I would did an implementation that determines which logger to use by itself. Unfortunatly it has to call Logger.getLogger() for each log-call. The question is: would application performance be better if I kept the Logger references in a hashtable and retrieved them from there by name? This might seem like an unnecessary question but I just don't know how much over-heap there is involved when calling Logger.getLogger().
Thanks in advance, Wulf PS:"I made a serious effort to see if this has been asked before via the mail archives, so please excuse me if it, in fact, has been" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
