"Scott Heaberlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Certainly - you could define a logger with the name of the class itself, > then effectively squelch it: > > via DOMConfigurator: > > <logger name="com.mycompany.myproduct.MyClass" additivity="false"> > <level value="FATAL"/> <!-- I believe you can also specify "NONE" > --> > </logger>
Thanks a lot! > <shamelessplug> > check out The Complete Log4j Manual by Ceki Gulcu > </shamelessplug> I already bought it and it's on the way. Song > > > -Scott Heaberlin > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Song > > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:48 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Can we control the logging level to class level > > instead of package level? > > > > > > Hi, > > Can I do something like this : > > > > For specific class in certain package, don't log the event > > using specific appender while allowing other classes in the > > same package to do that? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Song > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
