Do you know that logging has a significant effect on your current performance? If it only takes 0.01% of CPU time then it doesn't really matter.
James Stauffer -----Original Message----- From: Robert Pepersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Which Way of "Extending" Gives Fastest Performance Hi all. I'm considering wrapping or extending log4j. I've read this subject in Ceki's book and this user list, but I can't find a performance comparison. I believe Ceki's assertion that wrapping is the best and safest thing to do from a software engineering standpoint. But, my users and my boss care more about how fast the application performs. I'm writing a middleware framework that has to run faster than the framework we have in production. Does anyone know which performs fastest (wrapping or extending)? Also, is the MyLogger (the one that extends) in the 1.2.8 download the latest and greatest? Please forgive me if these questions have already been discussed. Thanks, Bob Pepersack --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
