Yes, that would be a problem. Perhaps a different appender ? I think the functionality still makes sense.
-----Mensagem original----- De: Stephen Pain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: segunda-feira, 20 de Setembro de 2004 13:08 Para: Log4J Users List Assunto: Re: chainsaw filtering this could get complicated if there were two people using chainsaw connected to the same appender (which is possible with a SocketHubAppender) - and one wants to see DEBUG, the other only WARN and above... "Ricardo Trindade" <ricardo.trindade@ To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> emation.pt> cc: Subject: chainsaw filtering 20/09/2004 12:27 Please respond to "Log4J Users List" Hi, When using chainsaw with a sockethubappender, I imagine that log events that match the log level of the appender are always passed to chainsaw, and are the dropped by chainsaw if the GUI is configured to filter them. I think it would make sense if an option existed (or perhaps another appender), that would make the filtering on the appender. for example, when a log level of error is selected on the GUI, it could talk to the appender and set it to error. this would be especially usefull over slow links, etc.. thanks Ricardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
