Ricardo,
I actually agree with you. However, no one has stepped up to maintain the JMX support in log4j. If it's not maintained, then it can't be shipped. It's not more complicated than that.
At 08:23 PM 11/25/2004, you wrote:
Hi,
I think dropping jmx would be a mistake. I think it could be the foundation for some interesting features.
Perhaps a future module to chainsaw that would allow it to graphically configure a remote log4j ? These type of things using jmx make sense.
thanks Ricardo
-- Ceki G�lc�
The complete log4j manual: http://qos.ch/eclm
Professional log4j support: http://qos.ch/log4jSupport
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
