Ceki,
I don�t understand your reply. Are you pointing me to buy your book - in the
signature at the end - so I can get the answer? :(
Thanks,
Anil

-----Original Message-----
From: Ceki G�lc� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 11:08 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: is log4j printing out class/method name expensive?

Anil,

The statement is only partial and hence incorrect.

At 05:47 PM 2/7/2005, you wrote:
>"Log4j can print both class & method name, but in an expensive way. It
>creates a Throwable object, dumps the stack to a String, and then parses
the
>string to get the class/method name. As some of our applications requires
>high throughput, we need to try to avoid unnecessary CPU cycles."
>
>Hello,
>Someone made this statement and I wondered if it is true.
>If I write logger.info("hello"); does it do this each time?
>Thanks,
>Anil Philip

-- 
Ceki G�lc�

   The complete log4j manual: http://www.qos.ch/log4j/



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to