Very proactive. Nicely done! Jake
Quoting Peter DeGregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here is a link to a version of log4j called trace4j which provides a > built-in trace level to log4j > http://home.comcast.net/~pdegregorio/index.html . A detailed how-to will be > provided shortly for anyone inclined to do this themselves and has about an > hour to work on it. -- Peter > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Endre Stølsvik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.log4j.user > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:10 AM > Subject: RE: log4j trace enabled version > > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Andy McBride wrote: > > > > | You don't need to look at CVS to find what you are looking for. > > | > > | A search of the log4j-dev mailing list would have revealed many posts > > over > > | the past year which answered your question. Perhaps you should look > > there > > | before making remarks regarding what the log4j committers have and have > > not > > | decided to do. > > | > > | A vote was taken on adding the trace level and the functionality you > > desire > > | has already been added to the forthcoming log4j 1.3 release. > > > > Yes it was decided to add it, but not in which version. > > > > Ceki (and possibly others) totally refused to just add those majorly nice > > but _very simple_ changes to the 1.2.8 and 1.2.9 release. And now we're > > waiting for lots of other stuff that's for my part rather uninteresting. > > The 1.3 version does just not seem to happen. > > > > 1.3 comes when it's ready. And with it trace. Yes, okay. When? I want > > trace now, from a proper release. > > > > Regards, > > Endre. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
