Someone has to make the first move in the dance ;) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Deboy Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 9:26 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender
correction: If other frameworks started writing receivers, then there would be a reason to write an XMLSocketAppender. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 7:21 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender There is an XMLSocketReceiver that can accept events from log4cxx, log4perl, java.util.logging and log4php. UDPReceiver can be used to accept events from log4net. They all leverage the log4j.dtd (except java.util.logging of course, in which case you specify a UtilLogging XMLDecoder on the receiver side). I didn't write an XMLSocketAppender because log4j already provides a way to send events over TCP: SocketAppender. If other frameworks started writing receivers, then there would be a reason to write an XMLSocketReceiver. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Schuweiler, Joel J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 9/16/2005 6:36 AM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender If I were to "brag" or write an article on an up and coming appender I would like to see one that works across all the log4* stuff. A socket appender which doesn't serialize objects but communicates in a pre-determined way. After all, java is operating system independent, why not make it programming language independent (in the log4j sense) too? I know how hard it would be to get the log4* projects to decide on one way, but it's a thought. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Venkatray Kamath Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:33 AM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender Also I also guess ym doesn't receive the message from same user more than 2 times unless the receiver responds back with some message. -----Original Message----- From: Schuweiler, Joel J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 7:00 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender Re-connect everytime since you're making the new YahooMessengerAPI every time. Seems a bit taxing. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron Grabowski Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:29 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: Article: Yahoo Messenger Appender protected void append(LoggingEvent event) { new YahooMessengerAPI().sendYahooIM( getFromYahooId(), getFromYahooIdPassword(), getToYahooId(), (String)event.getMessage()); } I wonder if that keeps the YIM client logged in while the application is running or if it connects and disconnects for each message? --- James Stauffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2005/09/16/errors-via-yahoo-im.html > -- > James Stauffer > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
