I didn't know there were issues surrounding this. I guess our best bet is to log to separate files.
Thanks for your help. On 12/8/05, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You'd have to use SocketReceiver on the log4j side, there is no > XMLSocketAppender for log4j (just SocketAppender). > > I wouldn't do it. I'd log to separate files. Your app can block. > > See: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=log4j-user&m=101128939812371&w=2 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anant K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 12/8/2005 7:22 PM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: Re: log4j 1.3 Status > > How would it cause the app to block? > > Basically, what I am trying to do is run multiple applications > simultaneously, written in both java and perl, and have them all log > to one source. I cannot use a file because of contention, and I cannot > use a database due to various unrelated issues. > > What I was thinking about doing is running an XMLSocketReceiver and > have both the java programs and perl programs (using log4perl) log to > the server using an SocketAppender with an XMLLayout. > > Is this possible, or is there a better way to do this? > > Thanks. > > On 12/8/05, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wouldn't use socket based appenders then...write logs to a file or db, > > bur socket appenders could cause your app to block. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Anant K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thu 12/8/2005 5:48 PM > > To: Log4J Users List > > Subject: Re: log4j 1.3 Status > > > > I know it is available in Chainsaw, but I need to use this in an > > enterprise server environment - where no one has a GUI running, but > > must look at the log files afterwards. > > > > On 12/8/05, Scott Deboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > XMLSocketReceiver has been available as a part of the Chainsaw V2 Web > > > Start release for a long time (at least a year). > > > > > > For those who don't know, it gives folks using log4perl, log4cxx, log4php > > > and jdk1.4 util.logging a way to see their events in Chainsaw V2. > > > > > > I haven't heard any bug reports (of course, maybe no one's using it). > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Anant K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wed 12/7/2005 8:31 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: log4j 1.3 Status > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was just wondering what the status was on log4j 1.3. I looked on the > > > website, and it seems to be a bit out of date. The reason I ask is > > > that I need to use the XMLSocketReceiver feature on a project, but > > > there are reservations on my team at the fact that that is only > > > available on the alpha version of log4j. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -A > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
