Correct!
Logger configLogger = Logger.getLogger("CONFIG." + getClass().getName());
On 8/11/06, Madduri, Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James/Javier,
I realized it now after trying this. Here is my logger.
<logger name="CONFIG">
<!-- Logging level (i.e. WARN) for this logger: -->
<level value="DEBUG" />
<!-- Console appender for this logger: -->
<appender-ref ref="fileAppenderNew" />
</logger>
What I have to do is have this logger initiated with "CONFIG" prefix in all the
classes where I want to track trace events.
Thanks & Regards,
Murthy Madduri.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 2:42 PM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Different Log4j log file(s) based on Logging Level?
On 8/11/06, Madduri, Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the question I have is how can we have this level config which is not in the
regular list of levels? I mean the "config" level messages here are those messages
that are related to one flow of Configuration activity. This may include classes (
hierarchies) from com.xxx.config.init, com.xxx.util, com.xxx.services etc. My logger
definition can be very much like com.xxx so that it picks out ALL the messages from com.xxx
and below. BUT, it should pick messages with level CONFIG only.
I am not suggesting that new levels be added. Instead of a config
level, it would work much better to have a config logger hierarchy.
You then send all logs from the config logger hierarchy to a config
appender, all logs from the normal ("com") logger hierarchy to the
normal appender, all logs from the security logger higherarchy to the
security appender, etc.
> I have verified in the current logging levels, If I define the logger with level
WARN, it is logging all the messages WARN and lower. Though, I try to log ERROR,it
would not pick the message since ERROR > WARN. This way, I can group all WARN and
Lower levels to a separate log file. Similarly, I wanted to have CONFIG, SECURITY,
BUSINESSACTIVITY, PERFORMANCE custom log levels in the same level below DEBUG.
Do you want debug, info, etc messages to go to the config appender or
do you plan to add a log level filter to prevent anything higher than
config?
>
> > > <logger name="com.xxx">
> > >
> > > <!-- Logging level (i.e. WARN) for this logger: -->
> > > <level value="CONFIG" />
> > >
> > > <!-- File appender for this logger: -->
> > > <appender-ref ref="fileAppender" />
> > > </logger>
>
> > > <logger name="com.xxx">
> > >
> > > <!-- Logging level (i.e. WARN) for this logger: -->
> > > <level value="SECURITY" />
> > >
> > > <!-- File appender for this logger: -->
> > > <appender-ref ref="securefileAppender" />
> > > </logger>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Stauffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:51 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Different Log4j log file(s) based on Logging Level?
>
> If you want an appender to only have config level messages and no
> other level of messages then you don't really want a new level.
> Levels are all about cascading priorities and if you don't want that
> then a new logger hierarchy is actually much better. To add a new
> level takes some new classes and a bit of work (not sure how much
> because I haven't looking into it) but doing another logger hierarchy
> doesn't require any unusual changes.
>
> On 8/11/06, Madduri, Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > <logger name="com.logging.test">
> > >
> > > <!-- Logging level (i.e. WARN) for this logger: -->
> > > <level value="CONFIG" />
> > >
> > > <!-- File appender for this logger: -->
> > > <appender-ref ref="fileAppender" />
> > > </logger>
> >
> > The appender mentioned in the above example is an appender that writes to a
separate log file (ex, myapp-config.log) file. But, my question is how can I define a
custom Level CONFIG and make it lower than DEBUG? How can I do this in the solution
mentioned below:
> > >>> First,create a level CONFIG.
> > >>>make config lower priority than DEBUG,
> > >>> add filters to accept only config messages in that appender
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Javier Gonzalez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:33 PM
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: Re: Different Log4j log file(s) based on Logging Level?
> >
> > On 8/11/06, Madduri, Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We have hierarchical logging in our applications.
> > > But, this requirement is to have the logs grouped based on a custom
> > > level.
> > > For a typical configuration transaction, the logger can record messages
> > > from various hierarchies. We are not guaranteed of the sequence of
> > > messages in this whole transaction. We are pretty much getting all the
> > > messages, but, they ended up mixing with other trace statements.
> > >
> > > For example, if we have a new custom log level, can we use that in
> > > <logger> configuration like this?
> > > <logger name="com.logging.test">
> > >
> > > <!-- Logging level (i.e. WARN) for this logger: -->
> > > <level value="CONFIG" />
> > >
> > > <!-- File appender for this logger: -->
> > > <appender-ref ref="fileAppender" />
> > > </logger>
> >
> > You could, but that (I think) would mean you get all the messages of
> > level config and above, unless you make config higher than fatal.
> >
> > What you could do is have an appender that is dedicated to these
> > config messages, make config lower priority than DEBUG, add filters to
> > accept only config messages in that appender, and then set the
> > threshold of the other loggers above config. (root logger set at
> > config level) That way, the "normal" appenders don't log config, and
> > the config appender logs only config.
> >
> > --
> > Javier González Nicolini
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> James Stauffer
> Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
James Stauffer
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James Stauffer
Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
