Oh noes! Things go too fast. .... But it's LGPL-licensed this time around?
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Christian,
Well, I did not mean to say that log4j was dead. If you look at the
log4j commits, you will see that
there are still people working on and maintaining log4j. However, I
(personally) am spending my development cycles on logback instead of
log4j.
At 06:17 PM 9/7/2006, Christian Hammers wrote:
So log4j is dead? You should place a link at the website pointing to
logback... anyway, thanks for the hint.
bye,
-christian-
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
