Jacob Kjome wrote:
I like the idea, though you do realize that this probably doesn't have
a chance of getting into either Log4j-1.2.xx or Log4j-1.3. Log4j-2.0,
however, is pretty wide open. I suggest you fill out a Bugzilla
feature request and provide a detailed description of what you want
there including implementation details, if possible.
Jake
Hi Jake,
I will.....
Thanks a lot for your responses.
Ste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
