hi, just a tought (this might be a stupid question from me):
why would you want to do that? if you only have few requests i see no performance need to cache if you have large ammounts of requests then you'll get a problem when you're writing them to the DB at the end of the day. if you have large bursts of requests then i'd recon you'll be better off using the AsyncAppender. cheers patrick ying lcs wrote: > > hi, > > Log4j has a jdbc appender. But can i just queue up all the log entries > to the disk first. And at the end of the day everyday, It writes to > the Database? > > Thank you. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-write-log-using-jdbc-appender-tf2518754.html#a7029242 Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
