It's comming in properly. What I meant was that the Application server system logs are marking it as INFO level, but in the actual message the log4j message has the proper error warning.
thanks again for all of the help. On 12/14/06, James Stauffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't quite follow. Please give an example of logger call and the output that it produces. On 12/14/06, Adam K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It does that I just meant that it doesn't print out in the console with a > debug level. The word debug is in the message. Again I don't know why I > thought it would come into the server log with a debug level. Hopefully > that makes sense. > > > On 12/14/06, James Stauffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If you call logger.debug then %p should be printed as DEBUG. > > > > On 12/14/06, Adam K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks now all I have to do is change it from using the console output > > to > > > using it's own logfile and I will be one happy camper. > > > One final question/comment for those who are looking for the messages in > > > your server logs they appear as info regardless of the message > > > classification (Don't ask me why I thought the classification would be > > > communicated. > > > > > > thanks again to all. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > James Stauffer http://www.geocities.com/stauffer_james/ > > Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > -- James Stauffer http://www.geocities.com/stauffer_james/ Are you good? Take the test at http://www.livingwaters.com/good/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
