On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:15 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
That's an interesting quote. I have to admit that I haven't read
the Log4j manual and that's new to me. In Log4j, reconfigurations
are genrally not destructive. They are cumulative. It sounds like
the manual is claiming that the ROOT logger is an exception to the
rule.
Have you tried this with Log4j-1.2.xx? Do you get the same results
or do you get the behavior described in the manual? It's certainly
possible that this contract was broken in 1.3.
Ceki, Curt, anyone, can you shed any light on this topic? What's
the expected behavior? Is the manual right, wrong, or just being
misinterpreted?
Jake
My initial take was the same as yours. The quote from "the manual"
sounds incorrect but it is not in context. I assume that they mean
Ceki's "The complete log4j manual", but the don't specify precisely
what "manual" they are referencing and a detailed reference would be
handy. I have an old beat up paperback copy, but didn't buy an
electronic edition and the text may have been added in subsequent
editions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
