On Aug 15, 2007 at 8:40 AM, Arnold, Curt wrote: > I haven't followed this thread closely, but you should > consider migrating away from log4j 1.3 to log4j 1.2 plus appropriate > companions.
Thanks Curt. If you read my most recent post you know I finally have achieved these goals (all under WindowsXP): 1. Run a Java program that uses log4j, with a SocketAppender, and SimpleSocketServer to in turn output to a rolling file. 2. Simultaneously run a C program that uses log4cxx, with a XMLSocketAppender, and SimpleSocketServer/XMLSocketReceiver to output to the same rolling file. My current understanding is that the XML appender and receiver must be used due to C/Java compatibility issues. I used 1.3 since it has the XML receiver, and it looked to me like 1.3 was the latest and greatest from the log4j homepage http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/index.html. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Based on your input, I now plan to migrate back to 1.2 plus companions. Is Chainsaw in one of companion packages? I believe I have looked in all of them, but haven't seen it. I sure appreciate your help. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
