Curt Arnold wrote: > Unfortunately, log4j 1.2 was designed in a era where concurrency was not > as significant a concern.
As was typical of Java at the time. The times have changed. > There has been a desire, but no active development, for a log4j 2.0 that > was designed for concurrency, JDK 5 and the all good things while having > a simple migration path for log4j 1.2 users. However, there has never > been the critical mass of developers ready at the same time to make a go > at it. How far did this effort go? How close are/were you to the critical mass. I'm very interested in this, and if its close, might be able to help. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
