I have looked at the source here and I have a question.
Since the log4j extras has other methods of rolling over that are time based I thought if we schedule the rename for a lean period when there is not much log file updates then there would be no problem. Am I on the right track ? What about appenders that don't roll over but create a file the first time with a timestamp ? Does this solve the roll over issue ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/RollingFileAppender-not-working-consistently-tp28087307p28187724.html Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
