I am confused. Do you respond to my suggestion? I suggested to set up 
everything Logger and Appender) programmatically, as it is defined in your own 
config file.
Which performance do you mean? The setup performance or the runtime, when the 
loggers are used? The latter is independantly of how you set up your logger 
univers, the former should not concern, or does it?
Heri

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohan.Radhakrishnan [mailto:moh...@fss.co.in]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:26 PM
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Extending Logger
> 
> 
> So this is what I understand.
> 
> If I have too many appender sections in the XML then one appender for a
> logger is created by log4j.
> 
> Instead of that I can have one appender and a custom logger for each log
> file.
> 
> Both could be equivalent as far as performance is concerned. Am I right ?
> 
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Extending-Logger-tp30018462p30113734.html
> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to