> > the log4j properties that you originally posted has nothing in it about > jobManager; the output indicates that the one getting used does have > settings for jobManager. Jacob has asked a question that may or may not be > salient: are you sure the config file that is being loaded is the one you > **think** is being loaded,
Yes. The log4j debug (I posted earlier) says so. I also said I tested various other settings (like presentation/different levels) - and they all work with my code, but not with HttpClient's. > or has the log4j.properties morphed along the > way, and the file getting used is indeed the one that think is being used? > > You indicated that you were going to grab a fresh commons-logging jar and > use it. Did you, or did that step get lost in the shuffle? I did. Did not help. Fyi, it was also 60KB+ -- Tomasz P.