That is a good news. Could I still use log4.properties instead of JSON or XML format?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>wrote: > The log4j 1.x adapter should allow an application that logs using log4j > 1.x to run unchanged but log via log4j 2. However, the adapter has been > updated since the beta2 release to contain more methods and classes that an > application might use to configure log4j 1.x. Most of these will be no-ops. > > With the various adapters that are available you should be able to route > all logging that uses SLF4J, Log4j 1.x or Commons Logging into Log4j 2. > Integration with java.util.logging has not been done yet, primarily because > both ways to do it kind of suck. That said, if you were to use the jul to > SLF4J bridge even those would flow to Log4j 2 via the SLF4J binding. > > Ralph >
