Thanks for letting me know about that.   i will check into that today.

Ralph

On Dec 26, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Michael Minella wrote:

> Progress continues...
> 
> Using beta-4-SNAPSHOT now generates a file per thread (as expected) which is 
> great.  However, I do have one other issue with the new version.  The 
> inheritance of ThreadContext values does not seem to be working.  If I set a 
> value in a parent thread and do not override it in the child, the child is 
> not picking it up (this was working in the previous version).  Using the 
> example I previously provided, the third instance of BoringLoggingClass 
> should be logging with the ThreadContext's id set to "Main".  With the latest 
> version of log4j, it is null.
> 
> Thanks, 
> Michael T Minella 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ralph Goers" <[email protected]>
> To: "Log4J Users List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2012 12:03:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Map Lookup Question
> 
> You are probably encountering 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-129. This has been fixed in 
> trunk.  If you check it out and build it and then use 2.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT as 
> the version it should work.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> 
> On Dec 24, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Michael Minella wrote:
> 
>> Ralph,
>> 
>> So we seem to be making progress.  Using the Routing appender, I am now 
>> getting a log file named after one of the values I put on the ThreadContext. 
>>  However, it still seems to only be evaluated once.
>> 
>> What I currently have is a unit test that creates four threads.  In each 
>> thread, I put an id on the ThreadContext and loop a number of times logging 
>> a message.  The behavior I'm looking for is a log file per thread 
>> (technically one per id I put on the ThreadContext) based on the id placed 
>> in the ThreadContext (so for my test below, I would expect a Main.log, 
>> Thread_0.log, Thread_1.log, and Thread_3.log).  What I am seeing is one file 
>> is created, named after one of the threads and all of the output (regardless 
>> of the id) goes to that one file.  Below are the classes/configuration 
>> involved:
>> 
>> UNIT TEST:
>> =========================================================
>> package org.somepackage.log4j;
>> 
>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.ThreadContext;
>> import org.junit.Test;
>> 
>> public class Log4jThreadContextTests {
>> 
>>      @Test
>>      public void testThreadContextLogging() throws Exception {
>>              ThreadContext.put("id", "Main");
>> 
>>              new Thread(new BoringLoggingClass()).start();
>>              new Thread(new BoringLoggingClass()).start();
>>              new Thread(new BoringLoggingClass()).start();
>>              new Thread(new BoringLoggingClass()).start();
>> 
>>              //This is needed because JUnit kills all processing once this 
>> method returns.
>>              Thread.sleep(2000);
>>      }
>> }
>> 
>> 
>> RUNNABLE:
>> =========================================================
>> package org.somepackage.log4j;
>> 
>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.ThreadContext;
>> 
>> public class BoringLoggingClass implements Runnable {
>> 
>>      private Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(BoringLoggingClass.class);
>>      private static int threadCount = 0;
>> 
>>      public void run() {
>>              synchronized (this) {
>>                      // This is to test the inheritance of a ThreadContext.  
>>                      // The third thread will inherit the id Main from the 
>> unit test.
>>                      if(threadCount != 2) {
>>                              ThreadContext.put("id", "Thread_" + 
>> threadCount);
>>                      }
>>                      threadCount++;
>>              }
>> 
>>              for(int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
>>                      logger.error("I am logging: " + i);
>>              }
>> 
>>              ThreadContext.clear();
>>      }
>> }
>> 
>> log4j.xml:
>> =========================================================
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> <configuration status="OFF">
>> <appenders>
>>   <Console name="Console" target="SYSTEM_OUT">
>>     <PatternLayout pattern="%X{id} %d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} [%t] %-5level 
>> %logger{36} - %msg%n"/>
>>   </Console>
>>   <Routing name="Routing">
>>     <Routes pattern="$${ctx:id}">
>>       <Route>
>>         <File name="File" fileName="/tmp/${ctx:id}.log">
>>                    <PatternLayout pattern="%X{id} %d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} [%t] 
>> %-5level %logger{36} - %msg%n"/>
>>                </File>
>>       </Route>
>>     </Routes>
>>   </Routing>
>> <!--     <File name="File" fileName="/tmp/$${ctx:id}.log">
>>     <PatternLayout pattern="%X{id} %d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} [%t] %-5level 
>> %logger{36} - %msg%n"/>
>>   </File>
>> -->  </appenders>
>> <loggers>
>>   <root level="debug">
>>     <appender-ref ref="Routing"/>
>>   </root>
>> </loggers>
>> </configuration>
>> 
>> From the above, I end up with one file named either Main.log or Thread_X.log 
>> (X being the thread number set above), however the output in that file shows 
>> the results from all of the threads (via the %X{id} at the beginning of each 
>> line) as shown below:
>> 
>> Thread_0 09:30:52.519 [Thread-1] ERROR 
>> org.somepackage.log4j.BoringLoggingClass - I am logging: 0
>> Thread_3 09:30:52.519 [Thread-4] ERROR 
>> org.somepackage.log4j.BoringLoggingClass - I am logging: 0
>> Main 09:30:52.519 [Thread-3] ERROR org.somepackage.log4j.BoringLoggingClass 
>> - I am logging: 0
>> Thread_1 09:30:52.519 [Thread-2] ERROR 
>> org.somepackage.log4j.BoringLoggingClass - I am logging: 0
>> Thread_0 09:30:52.525 [Thread-1] ERROR 
>> org.somepackage.log4j.BoringLoggingClass - I am logging: 1
>> ...
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Michael T Minella 
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ralph Goers" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Log4J Users List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 2:15:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: Map Lookup Question
>> 
>> I started thinking about this and realized I have given you an incorrect 
>> answer.
>> 
>> The file appender is initialized when the configuration is processed and is 
>> not reevaluated for every event.  Thus giving it a variable with 2 '$' 
>> characters doesn't make sense.  Likewise, when the configuration is 
>> processed it is likely that your ThreadContext.put() call hasn't taken place 
>> yet and so you are getting the variable expression as the value since it 
>> hasn't been defined.  If you really want an appender that can write to a 
>> different file based on a ThreadContext value then you would need to use the 
>> RoutingAppender.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 21, 2012, at 4:23 PM, Michael Minella wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I'm looking at the log4j 2 's thread specific features and had a question. 
>>> In my code I set an id as follows: 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ThreadContext.put( "id" , "Main" ); 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> and attempt to reference it in my configuration file as shown below: 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> < File name = "File" fileName = "/tmp/myLog.log" > 
>>> < PatternLayout pattern = "%X{id} %d{HH:mm:ss.SSS} [%t] %-5level 
>>> %logger{36} - %msg ${ctx:id} %n" /> 
>>> </ File > 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If I use the lookup in the pattern layout to test it, it works fine. 
>>> However, if I move that lookup to the fileName attribute in the line above, 
>>> the replacement doesn't occur (my file ends up being named 
>>> /tmp/${ctx.id}.log for example). Is that a limitation of that lookup or am 
>>> I missing something? Any insight that can be provided is appreciated. 
>>> Thanks in advance! 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> Michael T Minella 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to