It should work if the annotation processor is being invoked. See if your
application is having a Log4j2Plugins.dat file being generated and included in
your jar.
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Clément Guillaume <cguilla...@hotpads.com> wrote:
>
> PluginManager.addPackage(“com.myorg.mypackage”) works with trunk ! But for
> me it is almost the same as setting the system property.
> I would love that it automatically find my ConfigurationFactory. Is it a
> bug?
>
> Clément
>
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The packages attribute in configuration (and the corresponding
>> PluginManager.addPackage method) does not work in 2.0.
>>
>> This has been fixed in trunk and the fix will be in the upcoming 2.0.1
>> release.
>> Can you try with trunk?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Clément Guillaume <cguilla...@hotpads.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The fact is that the method getSupportedTypes() is never called ! (It's
>>> return a custom extension: ".myorg")
>>> I'm using 2.0. And even a call to
>>> PluginManager.addPackage(“com.myorg.mypackage”)
>>> doesn't works.
>>>
>>> Clément
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Ralph Goers <
>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It also occurs to me that the plugin manager may not be finding the
>>>> plugin. If you are using 2.0 then I believe the annotation processor
>>>> should register the factory as a plugin automatically. If you are using
>>> an
>>>> older release you might have been required to call
>>>> PluginManager.addPackage(“com.myorg.mypackage”) to have the plugin
>>> manager
>>>> search for your plugin.
>>>>
>>>> Ralph
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Your annotations are correct. However, in the code snippet below you
>>>> don’t show what getSupportedTypes() returns. The generic
>>>> ConfigurationFactory inspects all the ConfigurationFactory plugins
>> using
>>>> the order to determine which should be inspected first, second, etc.
>> It
>>>> calls getSupportedTypes to find out what file extensions the
>>>> ConfigurationFactory handles. If the provided configuration file
>> matches
>>>> one of the file extensions than that factory will be used. “*” is used
>>> as
>>>> a wildcard to specify that it handles any file extension (which is what
>>> the
>>>> XMLConfigurationFactory does). However, with an Order of 10 if you
>>>> specified a “*” I believe your factory would have to handle XML, JSON
>> and
>>>> YAML configurations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would suggest having getSupportedTypes return something like “.cfg”
>>>> and then having your configuration files end with .cfg.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 31, 2014, at 6:18 PM, Clément Guillaume <
>> cguilla...@hotpads.com
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm trying to use a custom ConfigurationFactory. I created and
>>>> annotated it
>>>>>> with a @Plugin and an @Order like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Plugin(category = "ConfigurationFactory", name =
>>>>>> "StartupConfigurationFactory")
>>>>>> @Order(10)
>>>>>> public class StartupConfigurationFactory extends
>> ConfigurationFactory{
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it is never loaded (none of the 2 methods are called).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I specify the system property "log4j.configurationFactory" with
>> the
>>>> name
>>>>>> of my class before creating a logger, my factory is successfully
>>> loaded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did I made a mistake declaring my ConfigurationFactory ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clément
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
