Are system libraries in Weblogic loaded as OSGi bundles?

On 6 August 2014 11:39, Mike Calmus <m...@calmus.org> wrote:

> After extensive trial and error I think I have things boiled down. In my
> list "works" means that I see logging. For some there may be caveats.
>
> All tests were run using Weblogic 10.3.6 (a Servlet 2.5 container) running
> on Java 7. There were no difference when using Log4j 2.0 versus 2.0.1.
>
> When I load the log4j libraries as a part of the server's startup classes
> (out current preferred configuration with Log4j 1.2.x):
>
> 1) Standard web-app configuration with configuration file specified in
> web.xml does not work
> 2) Configured with JndiContextSelector as the Log4jContextSelector system
> property it doesn't work when I have things configured correctly. If I
> exclude the JNDI lookup environment properties I get an error in the System
> log, but logging works.
>
> Removing the Log4j libraries from System startup and instead bundle them
> with the application (no other changes)
> Scenario 1 above now works.
> The JNDI configuration does not work.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Mike Calmus <m...@calmus.org> wrote:
>
> > We're using a Servlet 2.5 container and configuration. I added the
> > Log4jContextSelector environment variable to the container startup as
> well
> > as loading all the Log4j 2.0 jars with the container. I added the
> following
> > items to my web.xml:
> >
> >   <context-param>
> >     <param-name>isLog4jContextSelectorNamed</param-name>
> >     <param-value>true</param-value>
> >   </context-param>
> >   <context-param>
> >     <param-name>log4jContextName</param-name>
> >     <param-value>myapp</param-value>
> >   </context-param>
> >   <context-param>
> >     <param-name>log4jConfiguration</param-name>
> >
> >
> <param-value>file:///${sys:projectprops}/myapp/default/log4j2.xml</param-value>
> >   </context-param>
> >   <listener>
> >
> >
> <listener-class>org.apache.logging.log4j.web.Log4jServletContextListener</listener-class>
> >   </listener>
> >   <filter>
> >     <filter-name>log4jServletFilter</filter-name>
> >
> >
> <filter-class>org.apache.logging.log4j.web.Log4jServletFilter</filter-class>
> >   </filter>
> >   <filter-mapping>
> >     <filter-name>log4jServletFilter</filter-name>
> >     <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
> >     <dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
> >     <dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
> >     <dispatcher>INCLUDE</dispatcher>
> >     <dispatcher>ERROR</dispatcher>
> >   </filter-mapping>
> > With just this, logging works fine, but I get an error when the JNDI
> > lookup fails.
> >
> >   <env-entry>
> >     <description>Sets the logging context for the web-app</description>
> >     <env-entry-name>log4j/context-name</env-entry-name>
> >     <env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
> >     <env-entry-value>myapp</env-entry-value>
> >   </env-entry>
> > The JNDI lookup error goes away but logging stops working.
> >
> > I also tried adding the following with no change in results.
> >
> >   <env-entry>
> >     <description>URL for configuring log4j context</description>
> >     <env-entry-name>log4j/configuration-resource</env-entry-name>
> >     <env-entry-type>java.lang.String</env-entry-type>
> >
> >
> <env-entry-value>file:///${sys:projectprops}/myapp/default/log4j2.xml</env-entry-value>
> >   </env-entry>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Ralph Goers <
> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The best would be a sample project that demonstrates the problem. At a
> >> minimum I would think the web.xml and log4j 2 configuration.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >> On Jul 29, 2014, at 5:47 AM, Mike Calmus <m...@calmus.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I am having problems moving our web app over to Log4j 2.0 using JNDI
> >> > lookups. I followed the configuration documentation and am not getting
> >> any
> >> > errors, but nothing is being logged to my configured appenders.
> >> Weirdly, if
> >> > I remove the JNDI env-entry configuration from web.xml logging seems
> to
> >> > work, albeit with the expected NameNotFoundException in the server
> >> output.
> >> >
> >> > One possibly relevant configuration difference is that we load the
> log4j
> >> > jar files as part of server startup so each app doesn't have to load
> >> them.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas? What configuration can I provide to help troubleshoot?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to