Nice.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've fixed this in the master branch. > > > On 4 September 2014 11:24, Mikael Ståldal < > mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com > > wrote: > > > I think it makes sense to log to ServletContext.log() if something goes > > wrong, but not otherwise. > > > > Shouldn't we consider ServletContext.log() as deprecated, and Log4j as > the > > replacement for it? > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Should be log only if some condition is met? Like the status logger > level > > > set to DEBUG? > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Mikael Ståldal < > > > mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Log4jServletContainerInitializer, Log4jServletContextListener, > > > > Log4jServletFilter and Log4jWebInitializerImpl log some stuff using > > > > ServletContext.log() at startup and shutdown. > > > > > > > > Why? I find this logging noisy when done when everything works fine. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mikael Ståldal > > > > Chief Software Architect > > > > *Appear* > > > > Phone: +46 8 545 91 572 > > > > Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mikael Ståldal > > Chief Software Architect > > *Appear* > > Phone: +46 8 545 91 572 > > Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com > > > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- Mikael Ståldal Chief Software Architect *Appear* Phone: +46 8 545 91 572 Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com