Nice.

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've fixed this in the master branch.
>
>
> On 4 September 2014 11:24, Mikael Ståldal <
> mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com
> > wrote:
>
> > I think it makes sense to log to ServletContext.log() if something goes
> > wrong, but not otherwise.
> >
> > Shouldn't we consider ServletContext.log() as deprecated, and Log4j as
> the
> > replacement for it?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Should be log only if some condition is met? Like the status logger
> level
> > > set to DEBUG?
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Mikael Ståldal <
> > > mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Log4jServletContainerInitializer, Log4jServletContextListener,
> > > > Log4jServletFilter and Log4jWebInitializerImpl log some stuff using
> > > > ServletContext.log() at startup and shutdown.
> > > >
> > > > Why? I find this logging noisy when done when everything works fine.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mikael Ståldal
> > > > Chief Software Architect
> > > > *Appear*
> > > > Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
> > > > Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> > > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> > > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikael Ståldal
> > Chief Software Architect
> > *Appear*
> > Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
> > Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>



-- 
Mikael Ståldal
Chief Software Architect
*Appear*
Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
Email: mikael.stal...@appearnetworks.com

Reply via email to