You may need to patch log4j 1.2 yourself if you're doing it at that level.
There's a reason why SLF4J and Log4j 2 exist, and a big part of that
involves the inability to improve version 1 without rewriting the API.


On 9 September 2014 03:59, Christian Müller <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello Matt!
>
> Thanks for looking into it.
> We don't looking for policy file configuration. Also changes on our log4j
> configuration are monitored and audited by other security features
> (somebody could disable the logging, do some illegal stuff and enable the
> logging again).
> We "only" have to write a start/stop messages to show, the application is
> running and able to log events.
>
> Best,
> Christian
> -----------------
>
> Software Integration Specialist
>
> Apache Member
> V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
> Apache Incubator PMC Member
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Christian Müller <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello list!
> >
> > For PCI requirement 10.2.6 (Initialization, stopping, or pausing of the
> > audit logs) [1], I'm wondering what the best solution would be from your
> > point of view?
> >
> > The PCI requirement are detailed further in the spec:
> > Verify the following are logged:
> >  - Initialization of audit logs
> >  - Stopping or pausing of audit logs
> >
> > Turning the audit logs off (or pausing them) prior to performing illicit
> > activities is a common practice for malicious users wishing to avoid
> > detection. Initialization of audit logs could indicate that the log
> > function was disabled by a user to hide their actions.
> >
> > The PCI auditor told us, "it's enoght" if the application logs when it's
> > started and when it's stopped.
> >
> > [1] https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/documents/PCI_DSS_v3.pdf
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Christian
> > -----------------
> >
> > Software Integration Specialist
> >
> > Apache Member
> > V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Camel committer
> > Apache Incubator PMC Member
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to